What I get mad about is when a sports facility is named after a person that had a lot to do with getting it built or obtaining a team to play there, then the name is changed to a corperate sponser. The Branden Berne Arena and Jack Murphy Stadium. come to mind Very tackey.
I am glad you brought this to light. I never looked at Wrigley Field as a corperate name, I always looked at it as the owners family name as was the Wrigley Field he owned in Los Angeles. You are right.
The only name change that I didn't mind was changing Royals Stadium to Kaufman Stadium. Mr Kaufman brought the team to Kansas City and built the stadium. He deserves to have it named after him, even though in life he didn't like the idea.
For the record the first stadium to be named for a corperate sponser was Sullivan Stadium, home of the newly named New England Patroits. In 1971 the Sullivans sold the naming rights to the Shafer Brewery for the unheard of sum of $250,000.00, thus becoming Shafer Stadium.
Also add Shea Stadium to the list with Wrigley Field, Yankee Stadium and Fenway Park. At one time, with the exception of the Polo Grounds and Braves Field, all the ballparks in the National League were named after the team's owners or a famous person. Time changes everything.
Forgive me for babbling on, but the great old ballparks mean a lot to me. I have a rather large collection of their histories.