skyviewmark said:
... Wildblue is an impressive product for those people living outside cable and dsl areas. It just doesn't stack up to what is offered by hardwire. But for those that have been using a dialup and no hope of anything else it is wonderful to them.
We have had WB & Dish (Bronze) at our country cabin since May. They both have worked as advertised (once the Dish was realigned to improve the signal on Sat 129 and Dish quit futzing with the 622 software). BUT...
I would NOT have installed WildBlue if there had been
any hope of something better than satellite at this remote location.
Even when everything is working peachy with WildBlue (or any other 2 way satellite ISP)...
* The 1/2 sec minimum latency on EVERY internet interaction means that the lowest speed DSL beats WildBlue hands down for web browsing and general internet usage. The only place where WB is better than DSL is for large downloads. Even then. WB's growth pains make large downloads unreliable (dropped packets).
* And while losing TV during a rain may only be an inconvenience, losing your internet connection while tracking an approaching storm on NOAA radar is a PITA which drops you back to radio and dial-up for weather news just when it hits you -- DUH.
But for many WildBlue has been anything but peachy...
* WildBlue has reached saturation on many of its beams (nearly 25% of them are currently closed to new users). Reports from WB users on these 'closed' beams reads like a nightmare of lost connections (principally those using routers) and terrible performance on simple web browsing.
FWIW our WB connection has been stable except during rain. And we have had only minor periods when general networking issues (dropped packets etc.) made WB unusable. BUT....
We had SBC DSL at out city house for over 5 years -- We would trade WB for that DSL connection in a heart beat of a humming bird.
If you are even _thinking_ about getting WB, you should visit
http://www.wildblue.cc/wbforums/index.php and do a little homework.
Talon Dancer