Why would locals on 105 be more compressed than locals on 110?

miguelaqui

SatelliteGuys Pro
Original poster
Oct 14, 2004
1,002
28
The Richmond, VA, locals look very washed out on E*; never seen them on D*.

I "moved" back to the Roanoke DMA and the channels are much better!!!

It just seems to me that they would have compressed Roanoke's channels more than they did Richmond's.

On cable, the Richmond locals look just as good as the Roanoke ones do, with exception to WB; there is no WB in Richmond :)

Are the locals on 105 just compressed more in general, or is this just an add example?
 

Revamping my setup - what do I need?

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)