The LNBs wil be DP, not legacy. The OUTPUTS will feed either legacy, DP, or DP+ receiver inputs.chelsea said:Its still be tested. A power source is included. When: by May.
The DP44 will be able to do all DP lnb's or all legacy lnb's, no mixing.
bcshields said:I can't wait for the DP Diplexor to come out. Think of it, one wire running into the house for a 2 tuner rcvr, or split to run two rcvrs. That could save alot of hassle.
The DP44 is really only for a few rare customers who want everything. I don't see much usage.
The DP diplexer will be used in conjunction with one of the new DishPro Plus switches such as the DPP44 or DPP Twin.bcshields said:I can't wait for the DP Diplexor to come out. Think of it, one wire running into the house for a 2 tuner rcvr, or split to run two rcvrs. That could save alot of hassle.
The DP44 is really only for a few rare customers who want everything. I don't see much usage.
Scott Greczkowski said:I understand that CBS HD is now on 105.
Can anyone verify if they are avilable to subscribers?
WCBS-DT (CBS - New York) Nagravision 1 Nagravision 2 9483 4386 4387 E Conus P Smith 031114
KCBS-DT (CBS - Los Angeles) Nagravision 1 Nagravision 2 9484 4130 4131 E Conus S Noll 031012
UPLINKED <> Available to customers.Mainstreet said:Yes, they are definitely uplinked on 105.
IIRC the newer dual tuner devices have the DPP built in .. so no adapter at the receiver is needed.Stargazer said:The DPP diplexer would be nice to have for each of the dual tuner receivers but at what kind of a cost? Probably at a price that would cause a lot of people to run the extra wire to the receiver instead of buying the diplexer seeing how an extra wire would probably be a lot cheaper.
There is an issue of bandwidth. Right now Legacy uses 500 MHz from 950 to 1450 and DP uses two 500 MHz bands from 950 to 2150. That is to get one satellite to your receiver. Want to get two satellites on the cable? It might be tight (you can't go down to zero MHz). But the future is three satellites. That isn't going to fit.Stargazer said:Perhaps something that might be even better would be one wire coming from the switch at the dish to the house. At that point if they made a diplexer to split it to all the receivers at the house that would be a better solution than running two or three wires to the house to be split again two or three times. There would be less diplexers required this route although two wires would have to be run to each receiver instead of just one.