I'd like to solicit opinions on this issue. Let's say I'm a super genius who has come up with some great new way to attract new subscribers, perhaps I've gotten Steven Spielberg to create and direct all the episodes of a new TV series exclusively for The 101.
Steven says, "Hey, get DirecTV to put up a $10 Million total budget for my show, and I'm in".
Question:
Since there's really no way to determine if a new subscriber has joined DirecTV solely because of Spielberg's new show, DirecTV has no way to specifically determine what the investment returns are on the show.
The best I can do is to say: The ARPU of a subscriber is about $80. If you back out the direct costs attributable to a subscriber, you net out about $50 per subscriber per month. Given that the churn rate is about 1.5%, doesn't this suggest that it won't take very many of these unidentifiable subscribers to turn the show a healthy profit, given the low rate of churn?
Obviously, this scenario ignores many other issues, but at the core, what are people's thoughts?
Steven says, "Hey, get DirecTV to put up a $10 Million total budget for my show, and I'm in".
Question:
Since there's really no way to determine if a new subscriber has joined DirecTV solely because of Spielberg's new show, DirecTV has no way to specifically determine what the investment returns are on the show.
The best I can do is to say: The ARPU of a subscriber is about $80. If you back out the direct costs attributable to a subscriber, you net out about $50 per subscriber per month. Given that the churn rate is about 1.5%, doesn't this suggest that it won't take very many of these unidentifiable subscribers to turn the show a healthy profit, given the low rate of churn?
Obviously, this scenario ignores many other issues, but at the core, what are people's thoughts?