Prior to game 1 of the Nuggets/Lakers Western Conference Finals, the NBA's annual Draft Lottery will take place.
This annual drawing of ping-pong balls can be considered a pivotal moment for teams trying to get in position to draft a player that can change their franchise's fortunes.
It always makes me wonder- is it really a big deal to win the Draft Lottery?
Let's consider both sides.
The case for winning
Patrick Ewing in 1985- turned the Knicks franchise around (No frozen envelope references, please)
Orlando getting Shaq in 1992 and somehow getting the #1 pick again a year later, landing Penny Hardaway
San Antonio getting Tim Duncan in 1997
Cleveland getting LeBron in 2003- as HD said in his open letter to LBJ, "May 22, 2003. The Cleveland Cavaliers scored perhaps the biggest victory in franchise history. The right to the #1 overall selection in the '03 NBA Draft."
Chicago getting Derrick Rose last year
On the other side, sometimes not getting the #1 (or #2) pick is not always doom and gloom for a franchise OR even good for a franchise. Consider:
Bill, you know this very well. In 2007, Boston was a trendy pick to get the first/second pick in the Oden/Durant draft- they selected fifth. At the time, there is no way you possibly could have thought, "We won't get the high pick- no Oden or Durant- but we'll still win the NBA title next year." After all, look at what happened- drafting Big Baby, trading for Ray Allen, etc. What seemed like a nightmare turned out to be the best thing that could have happened.
2001- Washington drafts Kwame Brown when they easily could have taken Pau Gasol, Shane Battier, Agent Zero (they could have had him from day one), Tony Parker, Joe Johnson, etc.
2005- Milwaukee wins the lottery and makes a bad pick- choosing Andrew Bogot over CP3 and Deron Williams
Those are the cases for and against what happens in the Draft Lottery.
Your thoughts?
This annual drawing of ping-pong balls can be considered a pivotal moment for teams trying to get in position to draft a player that can change their franchise's fortunes.
It always makes me wonder- is it really a big deal to win the Draft Lottery?
Let's consider both sides.
The case for winning
Patrick Ewing in 1985- turned the Knicks franchise around (No frozen envelope references, please)
Orlando getting Shaq in 1992 and somehow getting the #1 pick again a year later, landing Penny Hardaway
San Antonio getting Tim Duncan in 1997
Cleveland getting LeBron in 2003- as HD said in his open letter to LBJ, "May 22, 2003. The Cleveland Cavaliers scored perhaps the biggest victory in franchise history. The right to the #1 overall selection in the '03 NBA Draft."
Chicago getting Derrick Rose last year
On the other side, sometimes not getting the #1 (or #2) pick is not always doom and gloom for a franchise OR even good for a franchise. Consider:
Bill, you know this very well. In 2007, Boston was a trendy pick to get the first/second pick in the Oden/Durant draft- they selected fifth. At the time, there is no way you possibly could have thought, "We won't get the high pick- no Oden or Durant- but we'll still win the NBA title next year." After all, look at what happened- drafting Big Baby, trading for Ray Allen, etc. What seemed like a nightmare turned out to be the best thing that could have happened.
2001- Washington drafts Kwame Brown when they easily could have taken Pau Gasol, Shane Battier, Agent Zero (they could have had him from day one), Tony Parker, Joe Johnson, etc.
2005- Milwaukee wins the lottery and makes a bad pick- choosing Andrew Bogot over CP3 and Deron Williams
Those are the cases for and against what happens in the Draft Lottery.
Your thoughts?