I may not be the best position to test this for you, but in N Ala I'm getting some tps, but not a lot, 12 or so but no video on some. 12022H 3000 is a female preacher , she's about 70/88 signal, good lock. But nothing scanned in on your 12080H. Something called RCS Maptable scans in at 12072V SR 1000 73/99. but no video on that either. Got one called SCOPUS-NET-TECH that scanned in at 12083V 3255 but whatever it is, is so weak it won't lock, just blocks of color here and there. I don't think I'm exactly in the footprint of some of those tps......the Hughesnet internet tps come in very well tho....
I don't know if you found this, but "Teleuisa Tijuana" is now around 11974H 1562. My receiver just scanned it in ok and I get 90% quality on a Coolsat 6000. Twinhan 1020a reports about 27% quality under TSReader and the signal looks pretty decent on the BLSA.
This is from just South of San Jose, California on a Fortec Star 90 with an Invacom Quad.
EDIT: Actually closer to 31-32% quality on TSReader after my blindscan finished and the 6000 is watching that TP as well. (Twinhan is slaved)
I don't know if you found this, but "Teleuisa Tijuana" is now around 11974H 1562. My receiver just scanned it in ok and I get 90% quality on a Coolsat 6000. Twinhan 1020a reports about 27% quality under TSReader and the signal looks pretty decent on the BLSA.
This is from just South of San Jose, California on a Fortec Star 90 with an Invacom Quad.
EDIT: Actually closer to 31-32% quality on TSReader after my blindscan finished and the 6000 is watching that TP as well. (Twinhan is slaved)
Gilham where south of san jose are you located? I just wanted to know because a few weeks ago I tried getting that Teleuisa channel with no luck. I'm in the Santa Cruz area, just wondering if the footprint you get is at a good level. Let me know, I'd appreciate it.
I am getting at least 85 to 91 %, on my signal meter which is normal here in New Mexico......
good here same as before Q 43 on sv-8000 (min Q10)