rad said:Why does it take this long to get the SW2 turned over? E* just launched E10 a few weeks ago and I've seen threads that say that end or April they'll be lighting up channels on it. Just curious.
GeorgeLV said:Well maybe E* rushing things is why they've experienced more severe in-orbit failures than D*.
http://www.sat-index.com/failures/
GeorgeLV said:Well maybe E* rushing things is why they've experienced more severe in-orbit failures than D*.
http://www.sat-index.com/failures/
One thing to remember is that D* got the Spaceway sats from Hughes as part of the D* purchase. But one clause in the deal allows Hughes to use the birds for testing for 30 days. So even if Spaceway 2 is parked, Hughes gets to play with it for 30 days before D* gets it.riffjim4069 said:Wow! I'm surprised to see SW2 still in testing ...
herdfan said:One thing to remember is that D* got the Spaceway sats from Hughes as part of the D* purchase. But one clause in the deal allows Hughes to use the birds for testing for 30 days. So even if Spaceway 2 is parked, Hughes gets to play with it for 30 days before D* gets it.
Remember, Hughes has Spaceways 3 & 4, so they want to know what they can do.
vurbano said:Maybe it doesnt work
riffjim4069 said:I'm not trying to slam D* (I was really hoping they would be able to deliver by now), but their progress has been very disappointing...
I don't think it was quite as bad, but it did take quite a while to get parked. Maybe they want to save fuel and since there was no pressing need (for them, not us ) to get it parked immediately, they took their time.rad said:Or is SW2 having 'issues' like SW1 did?
herdfan said:I don't think it was quite as bad, but it did take quite a while to get parked. Maybe they want to save fuel and since there was no pressing need (for them, not us ) to get it parked immediately, they took their time.