Thats because they keep getting rid of people and asking those left to do more and work faster and longer.Labor costs at AT&T are significantly higher. Part of the cost is being passed along to the consumer. No brainer.
nother incentive for subs beyond their contract to look elsewhere.
Labor costs at AT&T are significantly higher. Part of the cost is being passed along to the consumer. No brainer.
So, will they be raising the cost of tye protection plan again ?
I could see it going to 10 p/m for basic, hope not, but ya never say never.
AT&T has always had this odd practice of laying off workers while simultaneously hiring new workers..Thats because they keep getting rid of people and asking those left to do more and work faster and longer.
Yup, thats it ...AT&T has always had this odd practice of laying off workers while simultaneously hiring new workers..
I have a friend who just got laid off after 14 years with the company. he was non exempt so he was a member of the CWA.
Lo and behold, he finds a job doing the same thing as an employee, but for a contractor for.......wait for it......AT&T....Go figure.
Anyway, AT&T has just announced a new policy for the techs that install the Directv and internet services( AT&T Entertainment or so they say it may be called) will now be responsible for installing the service drop from the pole/pedestal. in the past, one tech did the interior work, while another performed the outside work.
The bottom line is these guys are paid hourly. There are work rules to keep the job reasonable.
That $5 per month is pure BS. Typical AT&T nickel and diming their customers as they've always done, creating revenue with zero effort on their part.So according to this, the Vacation suspend is going from $0 to $5/mo?
Also, the old wording on downgrading packages was "Up to $10.00 Change of Service Fee, if you change your Service package to a lower-priced package." -- I've never been charged to change my base package in the past. Will that be changing now?
AT&T has always had this odd practice of laying off workers while simultaneously hiring new workers..
I have a friend who just got laid off after 14 years with the company. he was non exempt so he was a member of the CWA.
Lo and behold, he finds a job doing the same thing as an employee, but for a contractor for.......wait for it......AT&T....Go figure.
Anyway, AT&T has just announced a new policy for the techs that install the Directv and internet services( AT&T Entertainment or so they say it may be called) will now be responsible for installing the service drop from the pole/pedestal. in the past, one tech did the interior work, while another performed the outside work.
The bottom line is these guys are paid hourly. There are work rules to keep the job reasonable.
Yep ...That $5 per month is pure BS. Typical AT&T nickel and diming their customers as they've always done, creating revenue with zero effort on their part.
Actually they are just following what others do ... being charged for that is nothing new.That $5 per month is pure BS. Typical AT&T nickel and diming their customers as they've always done, creating revenue with zero effort on their part.
New employees are cheaper and less benefits.AT&T has always had this odd practice of laying off workers while simultaneously hiring new workers..