Satellite TV providers bow out of US wireless sale

hbk409

Supporting Founder
Original poster
Supporting Founder
Jan 12, 2005
1,453
1
LI,NY
WASHINGTON, Aug 16 (Reuters) - A joint venture of rival satellite television providers DirecTV Group Inc. (DTV.N: Quote, Profile, Research) and EchoStar Communications Corp. (DISH.O: Quote, Profile, Research) on Wednesday bowed out of the U.S. sale of valuable licenses for advanced wireless services.

The venture, Wireless DBS LLC, had initially showed strong interest in the auction, particularly big regional licenses, and had paid the largest deposit of all 168 bidders that qualified for the sale, $972.5 million.

Analysts had been initially surprised by the level of interest by the top two satellite providers, but they said the combined effort was likely an attempt to win airwaves they could use to offer high-speed Internet access, known as broadband. The Federal Communications Commission is overseeing the auction.
 
Why did they bow out? Things are not looking good for Dish/Direct if they do not get high speed internet. They will not be able to make it in this biz with the competition unless they offer a LOT LOT cheaper programming packages than the cable companies do right now. They would not even make it with a merger if they do not get something done about the bundling. What are their other options?
 
Dish-Direc said:
The last thing people want is two dishes on their homes. It HAS to work on one dish to sell.

Not neccesarily, if you want Fast Internet and satellite internet is the only way then that extra Dish would be welcomed whole heartly. Besides if you live in the middle of NOWHERE why would you care about an extra Dish as there is noone to care.

John
 
Dish-Direc said:
The last thing people want is two dishes on their homes. It HAS to work on one dish to sell.
I agree... It might impress the folks around this site when an individual has a dish "farm", but I assure you, the general public's typical reaction is "WTF ?? Are they communicating with space aliens or something ??".
 
hall said:
I agree... It might impress the folks around this site when an individual has a dish "farm", but I assure you, the general public's typical reaction is "WTF ?? Are they communicating with space aliens or something ??".

Who cares? I feel comfortable speaking for many rural residents when I say "the general public can go F*ck themselves". :devil:


NightRyder
 
:) hes right if you need sat your out where you wont care about two dish's. your just glad to have anything but Dial up. its about the same size as the dish 1000 and same color. dish started starband and directv has left direcway. so the one dish idea has been done and did not seem to catch on. i think too many problems. again people in the country don't care about looks they want it to work really good for a reasonable price. i think wb is not going to last. they are having sever difficulties. and direcway and starband are turning up the heat on them buy lowering cost and improving service.
 
Dish-Direc said:
The last thing people want is two dishes on their homes. It HAS to work on one dish to sell.

JohnL said:
Not neccesarily, if you want Fast Internet and satellite internet is the only way then that extra Dish would be welcomed whole heartly. Besides if you live in the middle of NOWHERE why would you care about an extra Dish as there is noone to care.

In urban/suburban areas the dish companies will bundle with DSL and in the middle-of-nowhere rurals they'll sell HughesNet/WildBlue.
 
hobojoe said:
:) hes right if you need sat your out where you wont care about two dish's. your just glad to have anything but Dial up. its about the same size as the dish 1000 and same color. dish started starband and directv has left direcway. so the one dish idea has been done and did not seem to catch on. i think too many problems. again people in the country don't care about looks they want it to work really good for a reasonable price. i think wb is not going to last. they are having sever difficulties. and direcway and starband are turning up the heat on them buy lowering cost and improving service.
\

wrong, d* did not bow out of direcway. they chose to sell their remaining stake in the company for use of the newly lauched satellite which was planned for huges use only.
 
When I asked why they bowed out of the bidding, I was wondering why the cell phone companies were more willing to make a higher bid on the signals than the cell phone companies if the satellite companies had more to lose by not having them. Did they decide that the analog frequencies would be better for them?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Top