I must disagree with Iceberg here. After much frustration in trying to figure out exactly how far wrong my setup was (e.g. does 40 on the pole really mean 40 degrees inclination?), I made my best guess at pointing, then hooked up my cheap satellite finder and started slowly sweeping the sky.
When I got a loud nearby signal, I still had no quality for the frequency/SR numbers I was using. I ran a blind scan anyway. Unlike my previous blind scans, which dutifully flipped through the receiver's list of frequencies and reported nothing, this time I found something. From the channel names, I quickly determined through LyngSat that I hadn't found the G10R I was looking for; instead, I had nearby G13.
But this was a huge, huge breakthrough. Not only did it prove that all my equipment was working correctly (something I suspected but couldn't otherwise prove), it also provided me with the correction factors that I could use to find anything in the sky.
I peaked the G13 signal, then recorded what my compass and inclination setting showed, then compared them with the actual figures for my location. That's how I subtracted out the correction factors. I added the corrections to the correct G10R settings, and almost in less time than it takes to type, I found a quality signal. Later I repeated the process to find AMC4 with little effort.
In summary, if you've got a sat finder, you might be able to use it to set up a blind scan even if you can't find quality for the TP you want.