Maybe we should swamp Congress and the FCC with phone calls.
This seems like a classic case for why the laws need to be changed with respect to digital signals and who's "allowed" to get them and why people are having less and less sympathy for the local affilliates.
First off, the NBC HD coverage is NOT a mirror of the regular NBC Olympic coverage. Other than being Olympics, it's a seperate and completely different broadcast. IT IS NOT what is being run by the regular NBC affilliates, plus it's running 24 hours delayed.
So why on earth is a local affilliate's permission needed for the national NBC Network to provide it's HD signal to whomever they want for this event ? Especially if that affilliate doesn't even broadcast a digital signal.
I'm not a lawyer but I can't see how this could possibly be anymore a breach of an NBC / affilliate contract than providing HD coverage of the Democratic convention was.
WaltinVt
This seems like a classic case for why the laws need to be changed with respect to digital signals and who's "allowed" to get them and why people are having less and less sympathy for the local affilliates.
First off, the NBC HD coverage is NOT a mirror of the regular NBC Olympic coverage. Other than being Olympics, it's a seperate and completely different broadcast. IT IS NOT what is being run by the regular NBC affilliates, plus it's running 24 hours delayed.
So why on earth is a local affilliate's permission needed for the national NBC Network to provide it's HD signal to whomever they want for this event ? Especially if that affilliate doesn't even broadcast a digital signal.
I'm not a lawyer but I can't see how this could possibly be anymore a breach of an NBC / affilliate contract than providing HD coverage of the Democratic convention was.
WaltinVt