NFL Reinstates Michael Vick
- Thread starter Derwin0
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 285
- Views 18K
- Status
Wait.....you are comparing Charles Manson and Michael Vick??!!
I'm not. Two totally different cases. But that doesn't change the fact that Vick is still a piece of garbage to me. And apparently others as well.
Sandra
That is fine...we all know that. But let me ask you something...what did you think of Stallworth and Leonard Little?
I find it interesting that in the cases of Leonard Little and Stallworth, there wasn't the same amount of venom from those against them as there is for those against Vick.
Do these people think that a dog's life is more important than a human's?
Do these people think that a dog's life is more important than a human's?
It is the violent, disgusting.......oh! I can't even find the proper adjectives for the way I feel about it...way in which these murders were carried out TIME AFTER TIME AFTER TIME!
Hopefully, these human victims that you mention died instantly and did not suffer and are now resting happily in peace.
A human's life is more important, but Vick didn't just euthanize those dogs. He tortured them. This may not be the PC thing to say but IMO torturing a defenseless animal is a worse crime than what Stallworth did. Is there any evidence that the guy he killed suffered? I'm not condoning what he did. Stallworth should have gotten more jail time, and the commissioner was right to suspend him, but what Vick did was barbaric.
I agree with this but I would say what Vick did is not worse than what Stallworth did (not better either), but it's very different for the reasons you said. Doesn't make Stallworth any less guilty, and I would not have cared if Stallworth was suspended for life.
But it is not comparable to what Vick did.
Sandra
IT is an either or...do you think Little and Stallworth just as much filth as Vick?
I am not trying to make light of your statement...but you are saying because the person Stallworth and Little killed died instantly...and not suffered...it is not as bad as suffering before they died?
Never mind....
I feel there is a major hypocrisy with all that this I do not understand. What Vick did was terrible and horrifc... What Little and Stallworth did to me was worse, knowing the dangers of alcohol and driving. Hell, ONE GUY(Stallworth) ALSO had marijuana in his system too and the other one(Little) was arrested AGAIN for DUI...and people ACQUITTED him for that one...!! And what people saying about the Littles and the Stallworths of the world is very little....Vick is compared to Charles Manson....
...I find that comical and sad. The innocent victims in the drunk driving case were JUST AS defenseless as the dogs. Hell, I would say at least the dogs had a better fighting chance if they saw someone being aggressive towards them. Those killed in the DUI never saw it coming.:rant::rant::rant:
I am biting my tongue so as not to call you what I really think you are by that ignorant statement! The fact of that matter is that these dogs were too beaten up and weakened already by losing the fight before this worthless piece of sh*t did his indescribable deeds to them!!!!! Just how could they stop what was inevitably coming to them??????
Basically. What Vick did was premediatated. What Stallworth did was just reckless. He didn't mean to kill that guy. Now doing reckless things that harm others is a crime, so Stallworth is guilty, but it's not the same as doing something that's just straight out cold blooded.
You seriously don't want to go there. Seriously. You want to go on about Stallworth and Little go right ahead, I won't defend them. I never have.
If you want to say the dogs don't matter as much to you because they're not humans...they're dogs...OK. You can feel like that if you like.
But don't say the dogs had a fighting chance. Just don't. But don't belittle what the dogs suffered through. That's just not right. That's ignorant.
Sandra
- Status
