NFL 2016-17 Season

  • Server Issues.

    We are very aware that there have been system issues the past few days. In troubleshooting the system, it has been determined that the issue is at our provider and is hardware related. The provider was going to move us to a new server, however we are now told by the provider the issue is at the data center in St. Louis. They have offered to move us to a different datacenter on the East Coast or West Coast, however at this time we have declined the move to a different data center as it would affect the speed of connecting to about half our members.

    We are waiting for more information from our provider, however we are trying to ride this out to stay in the same data center, so that when the server is fixed all users in the US will get the fastest connection possible.

    If after some time the issue is not resolved we will be forced to move to another data center, if this happens there will be down time, as they will need to transfer everything to the new server and we will need to update the DNS and other settings for the new IP address of the new server. If we have to do this, the time it will take to move will be out of our hands.

    We are going to try our best to weather through this, so we thank you in advance if you encounter any issues.

    Sorry for the issue!
    CLICK THE X IN THE TOP RIGHT CORNER OF THE BOX TO DISMISS THIS MESSAGE
Only way to make sense of it is they're getting a #65-68 pick for him now rather than a #97ish pick for him in 2018.

They get the pick a year earlier, a better one, and control his destination rather than watching him finish out his career in New York or Buffalo.
 
Interesting tidbit from ESPN:

Since Sept. 1, 2014, the Patriots have made 21 trades that either involved a player leaving or coming to New England, the most of any team in the NFL, according to ESPN Stats & Information.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Agreed. As much as I'm looking at it from a Patriots perspective, this trade makes no sense for the Browns either. I would be happier if the Patriots landed either Joe Haden or Joe Thomas

I was always under the impression that after this season that they were going to keep Collins or Hightower not both. I don't think in their cap situation they could pay 2 $12m/Year linebackers, If that's the situation than IMO they made the right call in keeping Hightower. Not to mention that Butler is a RFA after the season and they're going to want to try and keep Bennett and find a right tackle. I don't think it's a coincidence that the 2 defensive players that played the worst in last years AFC championship game are no longer on the team.(Collins and Jones)

I don't think Belichick is going to make a trade that makes the team worse. Do they always work out? No. But, I am willing to give the benefit of the doubt.
 
I was always under the impression that after this season that they were going to keep Collins or Hightower not both. I don't think in their cap situation they could pay 2 $12m/Year linebackers, If that's the situation than IMO they made the right call in keeping Hightower. Not to mention that Butler is a RFA after the season and they're going to want to try and keep Bennett and find a right tackle. I don't think it's a coincidence that the 2 defensive players that played the worst in last years AFC championship game are no longer on the team.(Collins and Jones)

I don't think Belichick is going to make a trade that makes the team worse. Do they always work out? No. But, I am willing to give the benefit of the doubt.
I agree that I'd rather they keep Hightower, but that decision didn't have to be made until after the season. I think this trade was more about sending a message than anything else. But you're right, how can you argue with the success rate that BB has had. So until proven otherwise: "In Bill We Trust"
 
Wasn't it also the highest rated non-game 7 in more than a decade too?

Game 5 that saw the Cubs edge the Indians 3-2 on Sunday night pulled a 13.1/21 household rating/share with 23.6 million on FOX. That ranks as the most-watched World Series Game 5 since 1997’s 24.2 million for the then Florida Marlins vs the Indians. It was the highest-rated Game 5 since 2003’s 13.2/21 for the New York Yankees and Marlins and is the most-watched baseball telecast of any kind since the 2011 World Series Game 7 between the Texas Rangers and St. Louis Cardinals (25.4 million viewers).

http://www.forbes.com/sites/maurybr...orld-series-games-of-all-time/2/#6f09fdb152c7
 
Game 5 that saw the Cubs edge the Indians 3-2 on Sunday night pulled a 13.1/21 household rating/share with 23.6 million on FOX. That ranks as the most-watched World Series Game 5 since 1997’s 24.2 million for the then Florida Marlins vs the Indians. It was the highest-rated Game 5 since 2003’s 13.2/21 for the New York Yankees and Marlins and is the most-watched baseball telecast of any kind since the 2011 World Series Game 7 between the Texas Rangers and St. Louis Cardinals (25.4 million viewers).

http://www.forbes.com/sites/maurybr...orld-series-games-of-all-time/2/#6f09fdb152c7
A potential Game 7 tomorrow night may shatter the 2011 record. In fact, I think the Cubs win tonight. But then, Corey Kluber secures the MVP as the Indians win game 7
 
JPEG_20161101_171035.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimbo
NFL ratings are indeed down on top of that, would be interested in seeing ratings the last 2-3 years compared to the usage of daily fantasy sites though. With those effectively squelched in many large markets for the time being I wonder what their effect on watcher enthusiasm is.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts

Top