I know it's fashionable here to recommend RG-11 universally over RG-6 for long cable runs, but have any of you calculated the numbers? Given this is a DirecTV installation, the cable may have to pass everything from 250-2150 MHz. The low end is no big deal, but compare the attenuations of both cable types for 950 and 2150 MHz with a 500' run:
RG-6: 32 and 48 dB
RG-11: 22 and 33 dB
Of course RG-11 looks better in this comparison, but it would still be very poor engineering practice to make a run this long with such uncompensated attenuation. Another issue is cost. For simplification I'll assume non-flooded cable, ie. this is pulled in buried conduit. RG-11 easily costs 2-4X what RG-6 does. I'll be gracious to RG-11 and compare the cost of locally bought 500' rolls: $100 for RG-11 and $40 for RG-6. I'm going heretic to say copper-clad cable will be fine - the RF performance will be the same and see my parting comments on DC resistance.
Given 35 years of dealing with long cable runs, I would absolutely recommend the use of amplifiers for this application. Single, decent consumer units are around $10 apiece. Let's compare three configurations with price estimates:
RG-6 + 1 amp: 19 and 28 dB for $50
RG-6 + 2 amp: 6 and 8 dB for $60
RG-11 + 1 amp: 9 and 13 dB for $110
The second choice is clearly superior in my book. I would place one amplifier at the dish and a second at the 250' mark. There will be those who will throw a hair ball over DC power loss through RG-6, copper-clad no less. I'll again be fairly generous for the second option and estimate the LNB draws 200 ma, while each amplifier takes 50 ma. For simplification, I'll take the worst case where two amplifiers and the LNB are at the very end of a 500' run of copper-clad RG-6. The total current draw is 300 ma and the total DC resistance of the cable is about 19 ohms. This yields a worst case loss of 1.7 V, which will be negligible for a DirecTV installation.
Given the engineering facts, I believe the choice is obvious.