No waivers???? Are you saying that as of 1/1/05, or whenever this thing takes effect, there won't be any waivers at all???!!!Geronimo said:Ia m not sure what the rationale is but no waivers.
Holy not-in-the-citizens'-best-interest, Batman!
No waivers???? Are you saying that as of 1/1/05, or whenever this thing takes effect, there won't be any waivers at all???!!!Geronimo said:Ia m not sure what the rationale is but no waivers.
GaryPen said:I do understand what a waiver is. And, to me, it is not the local station saying that they can't provide the programming. It is them saying that even though they do provide the programming, they are WAIVING their right of exclusivity, and allowing me to also recieve it from a distant network.
After all, if they couldn't provide the programming, then most likely I live in an area that would automatically entitle me to receive a distant net without a waiver.
waltinvt\ said:I've never qualified for ABC, which I could understand, because up until a couple of years ago, I could get a great OTA signal. However their transmitter on Mt Washington, NH was destroyed by a fire (This is channel 8, WMTW) and they relocated to Baldwin Me. Now I get absolutly no signal from them (or any other ABC) yet Dish still doesn't qualify me for distant ABC. Is it possible that Dish hasn't taken into account the current status of that station ?
WaltinVt