Yeah, we'll probably have to wait until the 7th to see if anyone who has the HD Pack still gets NatGeo HD.
Since the standalone HD pack is $10 higher, I would hope that extra money is to cover extra programming costs associated with "unbundled" channels- especially these simulcast channels (ESPNs, TNT, NatGeo).
Most of the money in subscriber fees is to pay for programming. Hypothetical example...lets say Nat Geo charges 50 cents for the SD OR HD version, and 60 cents for both. It makes sense that they would have to restrict the HD version to the packge that contains the SD version, or the price of the lower package would be driven up. BUT, since the stand-alone HD Pack subscribers pay more, they should get it too.
Bundling the HD and SD channels together should save money in the long run. I was pretty unhappy about having to pay an extra $10 just so I could get Discovery HD and HDNET, because I knew I was paying TWICE for ESPN and TNT, which I never watch anyway.
BUT, if someone is willing to pay $30 for a very small number of HD channels, they should get everything. AND, the HD Bronze (or Silver) customers should have the option to switch to AT60 and HD Pack, so they can get ALL the HD channels, while still hanging on to a few basic SD channels.