Is there really any noticeable difference in performance between U-Verse's 6.0-Mbps and Charter Cable's 30.0-Mbps? Or the performance difference is barely noticeable and negligible?
I think its hard to see a difference unless you download a lot or have lots of users on the same line. Even a 10015 MB connection would support a few users streaming in most cases. That would be enough for the majority.
Just be sure there are not 4 smart tv's in the house trying to stream HDX from VuDu at the same time. Lol.
Posted Using The New SatelliteGuys Reader App!
That, IMO, is the only legitimate reason for needing these higher speeds. Even then, I don't buy the whole worst-case scenario method to determine what may be needed, i.e. how many PCs, how many streaming devices, how many tablets/smartphones, etc and add them up to come up with a needed speed. We have a dozen of those different devices but more than 2-3 are never connected (streaming) at the same time. Pffft, there's (5) people in the house (or four if you don't count the 3-1/2 year old) so we'll never exceed (4) devices. FWIW, we have 6Mb DSL and the only streaming we ever have an issue with is Dish.One of the most germane questions, yet to be asked is how many simultaneous users? That can bring the speed down for each user pretty quickly.
I didn't think that online gaming speed requirements were ever that substantial but many want you to believe otherwise. As you point out, and as I understood it, latency is what you don't want ! Low latency and high speed do not go hand-in-hand either.If you are into online gaming 6Mb is enough download speed to run most games reliably as long as you aren't trying to host the match. You would be surprised at how little speed you actually need to play most games online. Before all the streaming video services became so popular Xbox Live used to list 1.5Mb as the recommended minimum download speed. They now recommend a minimum of 4Mb. Your ping and packet loss is more important for online gaming than raw download speed.