A number of filings with the Federal Communications Commission suggest that Roku is getting ready to introduce updated streaming devices in time for the holiday season.Filings for the Roku 2 and Roku 3 streaming devices passed the FCC Wednesday, indicating that the company may be getting ready to introduce new versions for both devices.A Roku rep declined to comment.Altogether, the FCC filings mention a total of six different models, identified by the model numbers 4210X, 4230X, 4210X1, 4230X1, 4200X1 and 4205X1. Photos accompanying the filings show two streaming boxes that look virtually identical to the existing Roku 2 and Roku 3 devices, and the filings themselves don’t offer many clues about new features either.There had been some rumors that Roku may be introducing a 4K-capable streaming box. The company said earlier this year that it was beginning to support 4K video playback for TV sets built by partners like TCL, but didn’t disclose any plans for 4K-capable streaming boxes at the time.Meanwhile, Roku informed users of older, “classic” boxes earlier this month that it is phasing out support for those models.Roku’s new models come as competitors are introducing significant upgrades to their streaming devices as well: Apple’s new Apple TV is the company’s biggest update since the introduction of the device, and Amazon’s new Fire TV is the first major streaming box selling for less than $100 that supports 4K video playback.
I see absolutely no point in implementing GigE on a UHD multimedia client device.I thought this was strange from the spec list. 802.11ac MIMO dual-band wireless but only 10/100 Base-T Ethernet. You would think wired would have been gig capable as well.
The solution seems simple: Encode to a container that the Roku can handle. The storage savings won't make up for the cost of the computing power required.The video files are ripped using makemkv via VortexBox.
Just got a Roku 3 ...
Hope I didn't make a mistake not waiting.
When I talked to Roku support online , they said they didn't know anything about a 4 ... but that doesn't surprise me.
Thanks for the reminder, the 4 if the major difference is just the 4k then yes, I'm fine with it.Unless you have a 4K TV or plan to get one in the very near future you will be fine with a Roku 3. My Roku 2XD that Dish gave us during the AMC dispute a few years ago is finally starting to crap out. It randomly reboots if I watch video on it for more than an hour or so. It's been hooked to a bedroom TV that won't be upgraded for a long time so I see no point in spending more for the Roku 4.
I don't even think the Roku 3 is probably necessary for my purposes. I don't want to play games on a Roku and I have no use for the headphone port in the remote. I have been checking things out lately and it seems like I would probably be fine with a Roku 2, Roku Stick, or even a Roku 1.
I don't even think the Roku 3 is probably necessary for my purposes. I don't want to play games on a Roku and I have no use for the headphone port in the remote. I have been checking things out lately and it seems like I would probably be fine with a Roku 2, Roku Stick, or even a Roku 1.
How much was it ?After the Fire TV failure, I ordered a Roku 4. Hopefully it won't disappoint. My 2 is so slow on things like Youtube compared to my BD player.
S~