I have three receivers and had always understood it was a requirement for all receivers to be connected to a phone line and if not connected an audit was likely. To avoid the pain I keep my receivers connected, however, if its no longer a requirement I could save 20 odd bucks a month by getting rid of the landline that I only maintain for this purpose.
Perhaps the Dirt team could make a definitive statement on the landline requirement?
I have three receivers and had always understood it was a requirement for all receivers to be connected to a phone line and if not connected an audit was likely. To avoid the pain I keep my receivers connected, however, if its no longer a requirement I could save 20 odd bucks a month by getting rid of the landline that I only maintain for this purpose.
Perhaps the Dirt team could make a definitive statement on the landline requirement?
Do people still suffer DSL???Landline not needed if you have dsl connected to the receivers.
Do people still suffer DSL???
When the alternative is comcast or Uverse...yes.Do people still suffer DSL???
I have three receivers and had always understood it was a requirement for all receivers to be connected to a phone line and if not connected an audit was likely. To avoid the pain I keep my receivers connected, however, if its no longer a requirement I could save 20 odd bucks a month by getting rid of the landline that I only maintain for this purpose.
Perhaps the Dirt team could make a definitive statement on the landline requirement?
When the alternative is comcast or Uverse...yes.
When the alternative is comcast or Uverse...yes.
When the alternative is comcast or Uverse...yes.
I for one can attest to U-verse (Internet only) being FAR better than typical DSL.