Herring Networks lawsuit claims AT&T broke promise to carry its channels on DirecTV http://www.latimes.com/entertainmen...t-ct-herring-networks-att-20160311-story.html
But AT&T has focused more of its energy on DirecTV. The suit contends that AT&T promised to put Herring’s channels on DirecTV in return for Herring’s support of AT&T’s acquisition of DirecTV, which made AT&T the nation’s largest pay TV operator.See the most-read stories in Entertainment this hour >>
However, after the merger was complete, Herring contends, AT&T reneged on its agreement and its channels aren’t on DirecTV.“AT&T’s statements were deceptive,” Herring alleges in the 31-page complaint. “Instead of expanding U-verse, AT&T planned to contract it. AT&T also hid its plan from regulators during the acquisition approval process. It was not until after governmental agencies approved the DirecTV transaction that AT&T came clean about its plan to wind down U-Verse in favor of the DirecTV platform."A Herring representative told the Los Angeles Times that AT&T should carry the two channels, which combined cost 12 cents a month per subscriber home in carriage fees. The company contends that's a small amount."The lawsuit is baseless," AT&T said in a statement."We have offered to carry both channels on DirecTV at reasonable, market-based terms. This lawsuit is simply a ploy by Herring to negotiate a slanted deal."