That's the same cable I purchased. It works great on my equipment. It has the ferrite cores to reject interference, and the signal passing through it looks exactly the same as a my friend's $120 Monster Cable. Digital signals aren't going to suffer from the same problems as analog signals, as long as the cable isn't too long (>25'). And if they do suffer some loss over very long distances, you get a signal amplifier. High-end cable companies aren't going to roll over and play dead just because signals are transmitted in the digital domain. After all, they have a lot of highly paid marketing executives on their payroll. Trust your own ears and eyes. If you want to pay $100 more for a highly advertised cable, its your money. But first do yourself a favor and try a blind listening or viewing test. To remove all the influence, try a double-blind test. I've been part of many such tests, along with many other expert audiophiles and videophiles. Although there are sometimes minute differences between analog cables, I have yet to see or hear a difference with digital cables. The 1's and 0's are either there or not; correctly or not at all. There are lots of people who may disagree with me, especially those who make income from those high priced cables. I'm simply suggesting that you use your own judgement, preferrably in a blind or double-blind testing situation.