has anyone ever considered....
the possibility that more stations do not take the HD plunge because there isnt enough existing bandwidth for the DBS/cable companies to broadcast their new stations?
what I mean is.... as far as I know.... Voom is currently close to maxed, D* is currently more or less maxed, same for E*... and w/ VOD etc isnt cable maxed as well?
if thats tru... why would more "cable-tv" stations like USA, Sci-Fi, etc go HD since there isnt really room to be picked up. even with Voom's focus on HD they still dont have the room (or the money) in order to get all the available stations (RSN-HDs, PPV-HD, HDnets, InHDs, WealthTV, Etc)
I've always thought about the lack of HD programming from the perspective that providers just didn't think it was worth it money-wise yet.... but i've never pushed it farther to consider maybe it isnt worth it money-wise yet because there is no one who can pay to carry the stations due to bandwidth limitations...
Thoughts? Comments?
the possibility that more stations do not take the HD plunge because there isnt enough existing bandwidth for the DBS/cable companies to broadcast their new stations?
what I mean is.... as far as I know.... Voom is currently close to maxed, D* is currently more or less maxed, same for E*... and w/ VOD etc isnt cable maxed as well?
if thats tru... why would more "cable-tv" stations like USA, Sci-Fi, etc go HD since there isnt really room to be picked up. even with Voom's focus on HD they still dont have the room (or the money) in order to get all the available stations (RSN-HDs, PPV-HD, HDnets, InHDs, WealthTV, Etc)
I've always thought about the lack of HD programming from the perspective that providers just didn't think it was worth it money-wise yet.... but i've never pushed it farther to consider maybe it isnt worth it money-wise yet because there is no one who can pay to carry the stations due to bandwidth limitations...
Thoughts? Comments?