GEOSATpro SL2PLL Review

Status
Please reply by conversation.

wallyhts

SatelliteGuys Pro
Original poster
Staff member
HERE TO HELP YOU!
Lifetime Supporter
Apr 24, 2008
3,219
448
Its Here :) more to come
 

Attachments

  • photo (11).JPG
    photo (11).JPG
    1 MB · Views: 235
  • photo (12).JPG
    photo (12).JPG
    812.5 KB · Views: 221
  • photo (13).JPG
    photo (13).JPG
    812.1 KB · Views: 235
  • photo (14).JPG
    photo (14).JPG
    923 KB · Views: 233
Cool. Would like one for a fixed dish on 125w.
Will wait for another new product to be available, likely soon...
 
Isn't it supposed to be under the Titanium satellite brand now? :confused:

Regardless of brand, a standard L.O. PLL dual output LNBF is a welcome addition to the market.
 
pwrsurge said:
Isn't it supposed to be under the Titanium satellite brand now? :confused:

Regardless of brand, a standard L.O. PLL dual output LNBF is a welcome addition to the market.

Two different company's both have different products to offer :)
 
Boo on the weather. Waiting for it to stop so i can test.
 

Attachments

  • image-3012583740.jpg
    image-3012583740.jpg
    46.7 KB · Views: 172
Are you impressed with lies?

Technology currently limits PLL LNBFs to a 0.5 or 0.6 NR. Any spec stating that a PLL is less than 0.5 is a "marketing fib". It is impossible.

Wish I could like this post more than once.. :)
 
Are you impressed with lies?

Technology currently limits PLL LNBFs to a 0.5 or 0.6 NR. Any spec stating that a PLL is less than 0.5 is a "marketing fib". It is impossible.

Good info. I'm learning something new everyday.
Is it possible that other manufacturers are using different test methods. e.g. ant makers will often state ant gain as dbi rather than just db or audio amps rated in peak watts rather than rms to make their products look better?
 
Is it possible that other manufacturers are using different test methods. e.g. ant makers will often state ant gain as dbi rather than just db or audio amps rated in peak watts rather than rms to make their products look better?

No. Just marketing lies... Search past threads and you will read many posts regarding this marketing BS.

LNBFs with 0.1NR specs are typically 0.4 - 1.0NR or even higher. The Noise Ratio spec is widely abused in an attempt to influence a buyers decision. There is absolutely NO 0.1NR consumer LNBFs anywhere.

In recent years, we have been able to presort at the factory and provide 0.4NR with off the shelf DRO products. PLL LNBFs have a slightly higher Noise Ratio than DRO, but with presort the units can be distributed with 0.5 or 0.6 NR.
 
Last edited:
26°F Overcast
Goshen, KY
 

Attachments

  • sl2pll.txt
    3.5 KB · Views: 221
  • image-3135217949.jpg
    image-3135217949.jpg
    48.5 KB · Views: 203
  • image-1520600024.jpg
    image-1520600024.jpg
    46.9 KB · Views: 174
  • image-4065864471.jpg
    image-4065864471.jpg
    25.5 KB · Views: 163
Last edited:
26°F Overcast
Goshen, KY

Maybe trying it on 103W with the crazy skew would be impressive, as everybody is always whining about that satellite. I'd like to also see a comparison with the SatAv SL2-Bullet lnb (the tiny dual one) but everything else the same.

We've got 16F temps in Mid-Michigan right now. Sorry, I can't remember the keystrokes at the moment to create the degree symbol.
 
Status
Please reply by conversation.

The rule is "No Hack Talk" - don't be so rude.

123W VA Mux, "No Signal"?

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)