Doesn't good engineering practice include not siting an emitter in a location where it can reasonably be expected to interfere with the normal operation of reasonably well constructed receiving equipment located in nearby residences or businesses?
If these guys ended up in court, my money would be on the op, not the ham. A judge isn't going to say "Well either build a faraday cage or sell your TVs or move cause it's OK for the defendant to deny you the right to watch TV."
I would say that good engineering practice and RF safety would both dictate that an emitter not be located in a place that would cause harm to nearby residents, but electronic equipment is designed to be much more sensitive to RF than humans, so what would be a safe distance for RF exposure for humans might still cause some problems with receivers.
As for "If these guys ended up in court" that would depend greatly upon if this is a CB operator or a Ham Radio operator. HUGE difference in the eyes of the FCC. There simply isn't enough information to support a definitive answer either way, based on the information in the original post.
Maybe a quick read of Part 15 would clarify the FCC's stance on this.
Somewhere, I have managed to miss in the constitution the "Right to watch TV". Was that in the Bill of Rights? I forget...
Steve, you seem to have something against radio operators. You are jumping to the conclusion that this guy is operating his station improperly... NOT that perhaps something in the OP's setup is improper or that perhaps, as sometimes happens, there is just GOING to be some interference.
If the station operator is doing something wrong and if they do not take measures to correct their wrong-doing, by all means turn them in to the FCC. As Digi-blur pointed out, most likely they still aren't going to do anything... maybe send a letter. If it continues they will move forward but they aren't incredibly concerned with the pea-shooter CB operators not playing nice for the most part unless they are interfering with a LICENSED station (Again; broadcast, amateur, land mobile etc.)
The TV Manufacturer should have built the device with this paragraph in mind:
Section 15.17 Susceptibility to interference.
(a) Parties responsible for equipment compliance are advised to consider the proximity and the high power of non-Government licensed radio stations, such as broadcast, amateur, land mobile, and nongeostationary mobile satellite feeder link earth stations, and of U.S. Government radio stations, which could include high-powered radar systems, when choosing operating frequencies during the design of
their equipment so as to reduce the susceptibility for receiving harmful interference. Information on non-Government use of the spectrum can be obtained by consulting the Table of Frequency Allocations in §
2.106 of this chapter.
If the OP continues to have a problem I would recommend a High Pass filter or a bandpass filter. A quick google search
turned this one up.