Your point is that you're wrong?
No, it wasn't.
(Have you been to Russia?)
FOX News Channel/DISH dispute
- Thread starter Bodo Fenrirsson
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 795
- Views 107K
- Status
(Have you been to Russia?)
That's what Richie Incognito said. http://nesn.com/2013/11/richie-inco...ts-to-hug-jonathan-martin-in-interview-video/
And yes, I get humor. But what people don't understand is the joke has to universal, not one sided. To come back and say that is an endearing term comes across as insincere.
Yes, and a quick google will tell you otherwise.
I was actually in Mexico during the games and let's just say the media was just as embarrassing for America as it was for Russia.
Folks let me say this one more time... and then unfortunately it looks like some folks will need to be removed from the discussion. (And I DON'T WANT to do that.)
KEEP THE TOPIC ON THE FOX CHANNELS BEING REMOVED FROM DISH AND NOT EACH OTHER.
Thank you.
KEEP THE TOPIC ON THE FOX CHANNELS BEING REMOVED FROM DISH AND NOT EACH OTHER.
Thank you.
Yes it is, somewhat. I pay for my patents Verizon account, they like movie channels, therefore i use their go service.
You should have called up in 2010 and asked for a credit then, not four years later!
Now I will ask for credit for the AMC blackout that happened two years ago!
One minor difference, AMC came back, MSG has not. The complaint is that MSG is not offered and they still are paying the same rates as others who get their local sports channel(s). AMC was a temporary loss.You should have called up in 2010 and asked for a credit then, not four years later!
Now I will ask for credit for the AMC blackout that happened two years ago!
Doesn't matter, I am still calling up. Oh I forgot, I am no longer a Dish Subscriber.
I wonder how many commercials Dish customers missed in those 9 minutes.
Fox did not comment on the extension.
So hes saying that DISH took the channels down 9 minute early.
Looks at this point that they are not even talking.
Looks at this point that they are not even talking.
I think the bigger deal is not the amount of time. It's that he is claiming Dish took down the channels and then told everyone Fox did. You're probably right though. They probably would have required that Dish take them down at midnight anyways.
Agreed but we really have no way of knowing which side chose to end the discussions. I could see either side doing that to try to tip the negotiations in their favor.
Edit: To add to this, I don't think it matters which side walked away and let the channel officially go dark. Like I said yesterday, these negotiations are a two sided argument. If a deal can't be made to keep the channels on the air both sides are at least partially responsible.
Newsflash! CBS is leveraging its owned stations to get rid of the Hopper skipping commercials.
Newflash! AMC is leveraging its lawsuit against Dish to get Dish to carry AMC and its other channels.
Newsflash! Turner Broadcasting is leveraging TBS and TNT to get better deal for its other CNN, TruTv, and TCM channels.
Welcome to the Real World.
So... why are you angry at Dish then if you admit that Fox is the guilty party?
Newsflash: The additional Fox channels are already under contract. And that makes this a completely different situation.
- Status
Similar threads
