I've heard stories you don't own, but regardless, Best Buy does not lease items to rent. If you bought something from Best Buy its 100% yours
It's leased, but you have to buy it first. It must be good to be directv.
I believe it's the only business that operates this way? I wonder if there's been any law suits that have challenged directv ownership of the boxes? Something doesn't seem right when you pay at a retail store, walk out of the store with equipment in hand after purchase, yet this is a "lease"? Something has always bothered me about this. It just doesn't seem right or fair. And yes, I know life isn't always fair.
I wish someone would legally challenge this assertment of Directv's. Writing terms down, doesn't necessarily make it legally binding. There could be something wrong with buying a leased item. Or not.
You can still "BUY" for the purpose of owning the receiver. The owned receivers originally are "PURCHASED" from Directv and can be resold but they usually have to be transferred by the Access Card Department to keep the owned status intact.So Directv does not sell any receiver anymore? If you buy one from say Solid Signal, you are simply leasing it?
boba said:You can still "BUY" for the purpose of owning the receiver. The owned receivers originally are "PURCHASED" from Directv and can be resold but they usually have to be transferred by the Access Card Department to keep the owned status intact.
Think of it this way. If DirecTV supplied the receivers at no cost, then the monthly fees would most likely be a lot higher. And possibly the programming fees as well.
Here are the offical prices for OWNED equipment
SD 199
SDDVR 399
HD 399
HDDVR 499
If your willing to pay that to dtv then they would be considered owned by you. Also buying them at owned prices keeps the two year agreement way .