A typo on the packaging understating the product is not nearly as bad as the HD-DVD fubar of printing things that do not appear on the discs.
A typo on the packaging understating the product is not nearly as bad as the HD-DVD fubar of printing things that do not appear on the discs.
How about framing issues?
when was this
Of course not, because the info then couldnt be spun in a way to make blu-ray look bad.I'm also curious... if Disney was an HD-DVD backer, would you guys be coming here posting every little mistake they made, since this really has nothing to do with the format? Or would you leave that to Joe?
Of course not, because the info then couldnt be spun in a way to make blu-ray look bad.
In any case, i have to file this under "who gives a sh.."
Its trivial and has nothing to do with the actual format as you pointed out.
Completely agree... although there are plenty of things (on both sides) that fall into that category and yet are blown way out of proportion.
Not on THIS movie though from what i can see. Also was the framing issue the original intent of the thread?POTC had framing issues and now the problem with the specs. Hence, the use of again in the title. Understand?
Disney's QC is atrocious. DID they cut off Orlando Blooms' head again?POTC had framing issues and now the problem with the specs. Hence, the use of again in the title. Understand?