I don't know if anyone read this from Mike Kohl's website:
Pansat has discontinued two of their more basic MPEG-2 receivers; models 2700 and 2800, which were replaced by their 150
and 250 series units. They received some bad news last month when an appeal that would have paralleled Coolsat's successful challenge of DISH Network's demand for customer names was rejected. If you have purchased a Pansat receiver
in the last five years, do not be surprised if DISH Network lawyers contact you to do a survey about what channels you
are using that equipment to receive. We trust that the vast majority of our customers bought equipment strictly for
legitimate reception of non subscription signals. But DISH Network is trying to collect information in order to build
a case that suggests that the majority of MPEG-2 free to air receivers on the market have been compromised for illegal use.
If you are like one of our typical customers, we strongly urge you to explain to them that there are lots of other channels in
the sky that do not involve their subscription service, and list them. I prefer PBS from 125 West,
international news from Al-Jazeera and Russia Today on 97 West, and a host of services from Equity Broadcasting
on 123---all Ku-band satellites; not even using DBS frequencies. The whole legal process appears to be
very over-reaching, but some corrupt or easily manipulated judges were convinced by DISH Network's legal team
that the majority of independent satellite users were involved in illegal activity, and signed off on subpoenas
demanding the release of customer names of persons that purchased MPEG-2 gear. If you are asked in such a survey,
please set these people straight. DISH Network needs to replace their encryption system like DirecTV did several
years ago, and this problem would go away.
http://www.global-cm.net/news&views.html
Pansat has discontinued two of their more basic MPEG-2 receivers; models 2700 and 2800, which were replaced by their 150
and 250 series units. They received some bad news last month when an appeal that would have paralleled Coolsat's successful challenge of DISH Network's demand for customer names was rejected. If you have purchased a Pansat receiver
in the last five years, do not be surprised if DISH Network lawyers contact you to do a survey about what channels you
are using that equipment to receive. We trust that the vast majority of our customers bought equipment strictly for
legitimate reception of non subscription signals. But DISH Network is trying to collect information in order to build
a case that suggests that the majority of MPEG-2 free to air receivers on the market have been compromised for illegal use.
If you are like one of our typical customers, we strongly urge you to explain to them that there are lots of other channels in
the sky that do not involve their subscription service, and list them. I prefer PBS from 125 West,
international news from Al-Jazeera and Russia Today on 97 West, and a host of services from Equity Broadcasting
on 123---all Ku-band satellites; not even using DBS frequencies. The whole legal process appears to be
very over-reaching, but some corrupt or easily manipulated judges were convinced by DISH Network's legal team
that the majority of independent satellite users were involved in illegal activity, and signed off on subpoenas
demanding the release of customer names of persons that purchased MPEG-2 gear. If you are asked in such a survey,
please set these people straight. DISH Network needs to replace their encryption system like DirecTV did several
years ago, and this problem would go away.
http://www.global-cm.net/news&views.html