I have been contemplating this for some time now. I am just interested in what other people are thinking on this. I here arguments that Voom is good for HD because of the competition, but in my opinion the may have actually damaged the future of HD. First the offered free programming in the beginning to lure people into getting HD service through them. In my opinion this was not very successful. There was an extremely low subscriber base, but also take into consideration the large buy in amount needed up front. Then there was the free install lease option wich also failed in my opinion. Are other providers seeing this as people don't want HD even if it is free?
Now Voom is increasing there rates (supposedly) come January 1st. It is also my understanding that new subscribers are already paying higher rates. If Voom has some success in its subscriber base by then will other providers see this as... People want HD whatever the cost?
So this brings up two questions in my mind.
1. Is Voom helping the HDTV future and will they continue to or not to?
2. Is Voom's style of competition beneficial to the consumers such as us?
Now Voom is increasing there rates (supposedly) come January 1st. It is also my understanding that new subscribers are already paying higher rates. If Voom has some success in its subscriber base by then will other providers see this as... People want HD whatever the cost?
So this brings up two questions in my mind.
1. Is Voom helping the HDTV future and will they continue to or not to?
2. Is Voom's style of competition beneficial to the consumers such as us?