You can get a patent for making an improvement on an existing invention or combination of inventions. This is referred to as a design patent or in legal lingo- a derivative patent. I don't believe the show host understands this concept in the patent law. If you make something that looks, feels, and functions like something else that is patented, then you have infringed on that patent. This is the nature of Apple's infringement suits. They are not claiming that they invented the smart phone, just the design of the iphone. So, the host is somewhat correct that Apple is a recipe company if you define recipe as a design. Apple improves on many existing patents through design and implementation. The host is quite correct that Apple never really invented anything if the contest he is holding restricts invention to a fundamental new device and ignores any derivative patented device. Fun contest by his rules but is not in line with patent law.