Someone tell me that this isn't so!!! PC mag seems to think that Liberty is more interested in broadband than HD!!!
http://tinyurl.com/ygvvg5
http://tinyurl.com/ygvvg5
Well, if you think it's just me, here is what PC Mag had to say about the article:
DirecTV Sold, Malone to Focus on Broadband
Count me as a happy DirecTV subscriber, although I'm concerned about how the satellite net will transform to HDTV while keeping my TiVo intact. But now that Liberty Media is poised to assume control from Rupert Murdoch, HD might drop onto the back burner yet again. That's because high-speed networking, not better video quality, seems to be tops on Malone's list. For details on the sale, and how Malone might end up offering broadband via DirecTV
As you can see I didn't make it up and I'm not the only one that seems to think we may be headed out into HD oblivion yet again. As you noticed, I put a question mark on the end of the title, not a period. Will it happen? I don't know, but we sure as heck don't have any promise out of D* that it won't!!!
Considering the business model the D* has used to this point, I would say that they aren't really too serious about any one thing at all.
And OTHER services. they have always tacked that escape clause on every statement they issue in regards to capacity. Those new satellites could get you all of those 1500 +150 channels or none of them . The keyword is capacity, not necessarily channels.Let's see DirecTV is not committed?.I guess I read the wrong article that stated that DirecTV will launch satellites 10&11 in 2007.Both satellites will give DirecTV the bandwith capacity for 150 HD national channels & 1500 HD locals.
or maybe 10 million paying double because they can get broadband.Who cares what he does as long as those 2 sats. go up this year for more HD. If they don't, I'm sure that instead of 15 million subscribers they will have about 10 mil next year.
I dont know how it could be massive since HD subs are miniscule. That fact are that they would probably make a lot more money offering a good broadband service and that is what Malone is looking at.People on dbstalk and this forum are overwhelmingly asking for more hd, not broadband. If they ignore our wishes I predict massive churn.
Sure....they've already paid a couple of billion $$$ for the 2 new HD sats going up in 4 months and 9 months from now, not to mention the infrastructure equipment costs, and they're going to walk away from all that new HD capacity? No way.
Broadband prices are dropping and margins are narrow.I dont know how it could be massive since HD subs are miniscule. That fact are that they would probably make a lot more money offering a good broadband service and that is what Malone is looking at.
Ain't it the truth....This thought process is downright funny. The conjecture is ridiculous. Wish we had something real to talk about
Broadband prices are dropping and margins are narrow.
Plus, the money's already has been spent making the new HD sats, as well as the new broadcast transmission center....that would make no sense at all - financially or business wise.