However, if you want high quality HD channels with the most popular HD programming, then you should choose DIRECTV.
Cyclone said:Swannie sure dropped the ball on hammering this D* exec on HD-Lite.
Bunnyman said:All I hear from D* is "wait until next year". I've heard that for nearly three years now and all we've gotten recently is TNT HD (B.F.D.) and Universal HD, which they should rename the Law and Order channel. Although I do totally love Battlestar Galactica in HD, upconverted or not.
There should be no reason why D* doesn't carry NG HD, Starz HD and MTV HD and I'm getting tired of them trotting out the old warhorse, "We have more NFL HD than anyone." Guess what, D*: Some of your subscribers DON'T GIVE A CRAP about the NFL.
How lame are they if they have to use something as obnoxious and dysfunctional as the NFL as a crutch?
and "soon" is defined as ????Scott Greczkowski said:I like the fact he bashes INHD since he knows it will be on Dish soon.
mbetts said:It's funny to listen to Shanks and D*'s customer retention people bash Voom channels like RAVE, which I enjoy a great deal, and then they offer crap like CD USA.
dude2 said:Would it be for the better or worse if the lawsuit merges D and E. No competion may make them lazy or would cable push them to the limit. Does cable have a limit on the amt of hd they can push through their cable. Also is cable hd lite hd?
Dave.
FlyingJ said:Madtown has gone mad! You will probably get transferred to the middle of nowhere and be back with D* so you can watch your Pack! Of course if that happened, you would have a great opportunity to change teams! Just cracks me up how people with D* or E* are so against the other, like they need proof that they made the right decision. The piece was fluff, like almost every other article that comes out about these two companies. I personally get a chuckle out of the new Dish adds with the NFL, now you E* guys have to admit, that's funny.