Tampa8
Supporting Founder - I'll stand up and say so
Original poster
Pub Member / Supporter
Lifetime Supporter
Note- this is in the Dish section because he specifically mentions Dish, and because of Chuck's (Mr Ergen to you) remarks on the same subjects.
So Jeff Bewkes CEO of Time Warner made some statements, and seems to me more and more the war drums are finally banging over Sports being what's driving the high cost of subscription TV. “We all know that the reason [prices are] up is the sports fee, it’s not anything else. Half of citizens don’t want that”
Dish, once again has been ahead of the curve on this by years. Right down to Charlie saying he doesn't think as many actually watch the sports as some think. Apparently Time Warner agrees.
He also mentions how Time Warner and Dish have low packages that no one wants. Well duh. They want lower packages with at least some channels they can pick. I happen to think most A La Carte would not be what people think it would be, but to suggest subscribers don't want smaller packages is ridicules when channels won't allow themselves to in packages as the Provider wants.
He then goes on to say how Cord cutting will have no effect on subscription TV. While the reason he gives has some merit, and for other reasons I somewhat agree, I think he is a little to dismissive of the amount of money that either is or could be lost to it. Again, Dish has acknowledged the possible impact of Online programming.
As Solid Signal points out, how ironic that the same CEO who talks (correctly) about sports driving the cost of TV, is the one who insisted their RSN be carried in the lowest tiers in Los Angeles on Direct TV to every subscriber.
http://www.deadline.com/2013/03/jef...roviders-have-no-reason-to-fear-cord-cutting/
So Jeff Bewkes CEO of Time Warner made some statements, and seems to me more and more the war drums are finally banging over Sports being what's driving the high cost of subscription TV. “We all know that the reason [prices are] up is the sports fee, it’s not anything else. Half of citizens don’t want that”
Dish, once again has been ahead of the curve on this by years. Right down to Charlie saying he doesn't think as many actually watch the sports as some think. Apparently Time Warner agrees.
He also mentions how Time Warner and Dish have low packages that no one wants. Well duh. They want lower packages with at least some channels they can pick. I happen to think most A La Carte would not be what people think it would be, but to suggest subscribers don't want smaller packages is ridicules when channels won't allow themselves to in packages as the Provider wants.
He then goes on to say how Cord cutting will have no effect on subscription TV. While the reason he gives has some merit, and for other reasons I somewhat agree, I think he is a little to dismissive of the amount of money that either is or could be lost to it. Again, Dish has acknowledged the possible impact of Online programming.
As Solid Signal points out, how ironic that the same CEO who talks (correctly) about sports driving the cost of TV, is the one who insisted their RSN be carried in the lowest tiers in Los Angeles on Direct TV to every subscriber.
http://www.deadline.com/2013/03/jef...roviders-have-no-reason-to-fear-cord-cutting/
Last edited: