Hard to say, but I would leave the cover off if I could get the points back without the elbo? I would have to see the difference myself to see which picture I would chose like you have it. But, the cover off to me would not be an issue. Of course I don't have a WAF to worry about either. If you could look at the difference under normal conditions between the two, and then maybe look at the difference under not so normal conditions (like while it's raining), and see for yourself which holds up better. My guess would be the CalAmp is the better between the two..... Even if the numbers are lower, doesn't mean the outcome is worse. I can use my Pansat 3500 with an Invacom QPH031 on a 1.2m dish and get a pegged signal, while using the same Pansat with a 0.8db lnb on a Corotor2 on a 10' dish and get a 40-45 signal, but both have clear pictures, under normal conditions. At the same time, under a very hard rain, the Invacom may pixelate or go dark, while the 0.8db lnb will drop 4-8 points and still get a picture. And all of this may not be the lnb or lnbf, but maybe it's the size of the dishes. So, again I say, if the CalAmp looks watchable, even with lower points, it may still be the better lnb...?