Satellite TV mix-up costs Belfair woman 22 trees (KATU Portland)
BELFAIR, Wash. -- A local mom who ordered satellite television is upset over the price she's paying, but its not the money she's mad about.
Instead, it's a yard full of trees mistakenly chopped down that has Jenny Guse fuming. The result is a messy mistake in the middle of her rural paradise.
"I moved out here for the trees after being in the city for so many years," she said.
When ordering satellite TV for her son's rec room, Guse knew she'd lose trees in order to gain access to channels, but she never imagined she'd lose so many.
"We have 44 trees down, 22 of which didn't need to come down," said Guse. "I hate it. Just makes me sick."
Guse and her neighbor used a chainsaw to chop the trees installers marked. When the company sent out a senior technician, Guse says he couldn't believe his eyes.
"He just basically said, 'oh man, what did they do?'" she said.
Guse says the technician told her the DirecTV dish was placed on the wrong side of the deck, facing the wrong satellite.
"We didn't want a foreign language satellite and those trees did not need to come down," she said.
Red paint now marks the stumps of 22 trees that mistakenly came down, and Guse had to chop another ten to finally get a signal.
"Bottom line: I want it cleaned up and I want the trees paid for," she said.
An arborist told Guse it would cost $99,000 to transport and replace her once-tall trees. Removing the stumps and downed trees would cost $5,000.
Ironwood Communications denied the claim, stating it was Guse's decision to cut the trees in order to access a satellite signal.
"It's just deny, deny, deny," said Guse.
KOMO News called DirecTV, who said the incident occurred before their company bought Ironwood. DirecTV promised to make all reasonable efforts to resolve the situation to the customers' satisfaction.
Guse is the first to admit she loves having more channels but not at the expense of so many trees.
A state law in effect can triple the amount of damages for trees wrongly removed.
Be sure to see the photo or watch the video:
Satellite TV mix-up costs Belfair woman 22 trees | KATU.com - Portland, Oregon
[Feel free to double post this excellent story at the DN forum. I won't complain it's off-topic there too.]
BELFAIR, Wash. -- A local mom who ordered satellite television is upset over the price she's paying, but its not the money she's mad about.
Instead, it's a yard full of trees mistakenly chopped down that has Jenny Guse fuming. The result is a messy mistake in the middle of her rural paradise.
"I moved out here for the trees after being in the city for so many years," she said.
When ordering satellite TV for her son's rec room, Guse knew she'd lose trees in order to gain access to channels, but she never imagined she'd lose so many.
"We have 44 trees down, 22 of which didn't need to come down," said Guse. "I hate it. Just makes me sick."
Guse and her neighbor used a chainsaw to chop the trees installers marked. When the company sent out a senior technician, Guse says he couldn't believe his eyes.
"He just basically said, 'oh man, what did they do?'" she said.
Guse says the technician told her the DirecTV dish was placed on the wrong side of the deck, facing the wrong satellite.
"We didn't want a foreign language satellite and those trees did not need to come down," she said.
Red paint now marks the stumps of 22 trees that mistakenly came down, and Guse had to chop another ten to finally get a signal.
"Bottom line: I want it cleaned up and I want the trees paid for," she said.
An arborist told Guse it would cost $99,000 to transport and replace her once-tall trees. Removing the stumps and downed trees would cost $5,000.
Ironwood Communications denied the claim, stating it was Guse's decision to cut the trees in order to access a satellite signal.
"It's just deny, deny, deny," said Guse.
KOMO News called DirecTV, who said the incident occurred before their company bought Ironwood. DirecTV promised to make all reasonable efforts to resolve the situation to the customers' satisfaction.
Guse is the first to admit she loves having more channels but not at the expense of so many trees.
A state law in effect can triple the amount of damages for trees wrongly removed.
Be sure to see the photo or watch the video:
Satellite TV mix-up costs Belfair woman 22 trees | KATU.com - Portland, Oregon
[Feel free to double post this excellent story at the DN forum. I won't complain it's off-topic there too.]
Last edited: