Yeah, I already know about the clips and examined everything so it's only the key that's bad and it may have actually been bad. Sorry about the other reading issue as this forum, the cursor can jump up the message I am typing to reposition itself so I could be typing something and then half of what I typed ended up where the cursor jumped up to since it can't jump down as it would already be at the end of the message to begin with.
As for someone figuring out how to watch the movies on another device, it depends since how many people do you know here that are on xda-developers? So first the DISH product has to be something the people have a interest in reverse engineering and I don't mean the people on these forums but the ones who usually break security. No different that you have not seen someone root or bootlocker unlock the Hopper Plus AndroidTV add on box yet either since neither item are considered target devices they have an interest in. Ofcourse if the Dish DVR was used by people worldwide with massive amounts of users, then that's a different story. A good example is I have Windows 11 and I am on the Beta Insiders Channel and I am sure everyone knows there is Windows for Android Subsystem where the official version only allows Amazon app store. Well, the one on my computer which I have to manually update on the Windows for Linux subsystem before installing on the Windows side has Google Play Store, and also Magisk rooted and I have had that for since 2+ years, kernelsu is also an option. The reason is because developers have a high interest in breaking the security on it so they can install their own apps by sideloading which is not possible with the official version using Microsoft store. No different than how people reverse engineer software, it all depends on the number of people who will benefit from it since remember it's a hobby and it's not like they will get paid for it and the other thing is they need to actually have access the the product in question so someone in Russia for example is not going to have a DISH Hopper 3 DVR and also a EHDD that is actually activated so they can see what happens when they try different things and see the differences in results when they try different things.
As for Broadcom, my experience has always been that Broadcom is just widely used but their stuff is extremely buggy compared to Atheros, the later which came from Stanford University people and later got bought by Qualcomm since who has the better modems. Yes, Broadcom might be better than Intel's Puma series CPUs used in Cable Modems as everyone keeps a 500 ft pole distance from buying any Intel Puma based cable modem.
As for what you said about HDMI, in theory it may work but until one has tried it, I can't say for certain one way or another if it will work or not as remember there is HDMI and then there is HDCP which is where the barrier is as it's not from personal experience as remember the HDMI capture card may be one thing but whether or not the DISH DVR's will allow sending the audio/video to the capture card is the other issue as I am sure there has to be people on this forum who actually has a HDMI capture card on a computer who would have done that if it was possible. Then there is always another theory where someone who can mount an HDD from a DISH DVR to the computer and then write some program that will take each original file which is a recording and spit out an MPEG-4 video file and then that video file can either be played back on the computer, streamed or even copied to portable media like a USB Flash Drive or even burned to permanent media like a BluRay Disc for example.
So I don't even know what happens when one rents a movie as I had never rent a movie even when they gave me free movie rentals either on DISH (November 7, 2012-current) , Directv (May 12, 2009 to November 7, 2012) or cable (from July 9, 1984 - June 1, 2009) so I have no idea if you can even record it as maybe someone else here knows and can provide a better answer.
As for Seagate Drives, you do know each line of Seagate drives can be good or bad depending on where the technology originally came from. The Cheetah, Elite, Barracuda, WREN series just to name a few are not originally Seagate products but came from Seagate buying the Control Data/Imprimis which are considered high-end products. The other product lines from Seagate are usually junk as they can be original Seagate, what was Conner Peripherals, Samsung, MiniScribe and Maxtor, forgot if it was Seagate who bought them or not. Even Maxtor has two different product lines. Maxtor for SCSI is from Maxtor San Jose which is considered high quality. Maxtor when making EIDE/ATA/Fast ATA is considered junk and low quality as those are known as Maxtor Colorado which I believe was known as MiniScribe before it was bought by Maxtor. IBM invented most of the HDD's and was the dominant player in the 2.5" space before other brands started making 2.5" drives. The 2.5" Seagates were the Momentus line and who knows if this is Seagate technology as their quality stuff is only those based on the CDC/Imprimis products. And ofcourse ST in the model numbers originally stood for Shugart Technology which was their original name. Momentus was also the product line that later introduced 500GB Hybrid SSD 2.5" 5400rpm drives which I still have two of in it's retail packaging container but never used. It's just like Cisco is known for routers and switches but the only ones you should buy is the ones that were actually made by Cisco and not the companies they bought and then changed the name of the product to Cisco as there is a big difference. Juniper Networks is superior to Cisco any day of the week as it is also FreeBSD based just like Nokia's firewall.
I have killed drives in ways you may have never heard of. Norton SystemWorks for Windows v9.0 killed a SCSI drive after it did the defragmenting. It was probably a issue with Norton SystemWorks as after that, they called it Norton SystemWorks for Windows v1.0. As I mentioned, I had a Seagate 2GB Barracuda 7200RPM SCSI drive which I kept on the floor upside down so the circuit board was facing, I drop a piece of dust on the circuit board which smoked for 1/2 second, the drive while the leds was on, it never worked again probably because it burned the circuit or some other component on the board itself. But the good thing were both drives did not have data on it and all I had to do was called the HD manufacturer who shipped me a new replacement drive in advanced. Those were all 3.5" drives in the 1990s. In the 1980s, 20MB and 40MB hard drives that were MFM and RLL from Seagate and MiniScribe were what everyone was using. ESDI and SCSI were considered the higher end stuff. HP, DEC, Storage Dimensions which is the same company as Maxtor San Jose, Control Data Corporation(CDC)/Imprimis, Micropolis were all also considered high-end brands. WD drives used to be more reliable but slower than the other brands like Quantum and even WD can be good or bad as I have also had WD 3.5" drives that failed before. The more recent the drive regardless who it is from, the less reliable it is because remember how much it used to cost for storage and it's like almost free now, so don't have high expectations it is going to last forever. I knew a friend based on trying to get data recovered from that 14.1GB 2.5" hard drive in I believe 1997 or 1998 that lives on doing data recovery and he told me every brand can fail and I wouldn't be surprised since all the current drives are made in Thailand or China for example. If it was made in Singapore, then I would trust it as those are reliable but the cheaper the storage goes, the lower the quality control goes. IBM now known as Hitachi usually has the newest technologies but they are also the only one who has load cycles before failing in the spec sheet so for example, don't expect a IBM/Hitachi drive to last more than 100,000 cycles if I remember correctly where the head is start and stopped which doesn't exist for other brands. The MTBF can't be trusted either as that's only a assumed average, some will last longer and some will last shorter and obviously no storage manufacturer is going to test each drive for that many hours, it's only simulated.
Well, the 2.5" drives may have been used forever in laptops but the difference is other people usually buy them after that model of HDD had been used for a longer period of time so they are more reliable. When I bought the 14.1GB IBM TravelStar which came in the most expensive IBM ThinkPad 770Z 9549-8AU in 1997 or 1998, 99% of the world were using smaller capacity and drives that had been out for maybe years already so they don't have the problem. My machine completely died maybe a month later so the MB was switched and then the HDD died as well, meaning it stopped working all of a sudden with no warning. IBM/Hitachi with the 60GB 2.5" 7200RPM drives in the mid 2000's I think also had it's own issues, I have three identical Dell Insprion 8200 laptops and 2 of them ran Windows XP. The one running FreeBSD had 2 identical drives in it and as you can't hardware RAID, it was software raid as the 2nd drive always mirrored the first
one. The primary drive in the FreeBSD machine did eventually start having bad sectors as well. Fujitsu was supposed to be reliable because they ran at 5400RPM but still had problems. Fujitsu was the only other brand who made 2.5" drives. Western Digital and Seagate did not make 2.5" drives until either early to mid-2000's and ofcourse the Seagate 2.5" drives died as well, they were also 5400RPM. Western Digital 2.5" 7200RPM might only not have died because I replaced them with the pair of Samsung 2.5" 2TB SSD's. Western Digital sometime in the last 10 years also had a time where their HDD's had high failure rates that lots of people avoid the brand even now.
As for backups, as I run a ISP. There used to be a time that I backed up my own personal website as well as other things but everytime I backed up, something bad would happen to the backup and when I don't back up, I seem to not have problems so I gave up on keeping a webpage and backing up and I haven't actually not had a failure yet in the last 11 years which is actually a record. Ofcourse one day when I have the time, among other things, I might do periodic images rather with Macrium Reflect using one of the enterprise versions of the software but really don't have the time now to do it as things are piling up including the DISH DVR recording faster than I can handle as I am literally 5-6 years behind in some of the recordings and 13 years behind in emails but my money on the other hand is also coming faster than most people passively as that is also generating a low 6 digits daily in long term investments, ofcourse there are days it will go the opposite direction but that's nothing as the recovery part is fast when that happens. Wished I was a family guy as being 7 squared or almost half a century old, still single and taking care of a 95 year old mom who lives with me and is the other person who watches the same DVR recordings with me as her being illiterate in any language requires me to do the select the video, do the playback and even change the channels as I have a pretty complicated system since lots of things are not directly connected which only I know how to operate as I have a Directv HD Receiver for example and the service was disconnected since November 7, 2012 but the DVR still works fine but i is not directly connected to the TV as first it connects to a HDMI switch where the output of the HDMI switch goes to my Oppo BDP-105D BluRay Disc Player and from there, you still have to select the source as HDMI before it can be played back on the TV which you would also need to select as Blu-Ray Player on the TV itself. And don't think about tracing the wires either as it looks like a rats nest as my friend would call it.