Satelliteguys is quoted as being "America's Satellite Information Source." I hate to open a wound, but I can't help but notice (perhaps others have, but didn't say anything) the perceived bias towards DISH, the red end of the spectrum, vs DIRECTV, the blue end of the dial.
Specifically, the "Hopper" from DISH is greeted with great fanfare, compared to DIRECTV's HR34 which is actually technically superior.
It seems to me that "America's Satellite Information Source" might be a bit tilted towards the red end vs the blue end, rather than the purple, where it sets itself to be.
There is a "FIRST LOOK" for the Hopper, where was this for the HR34??
Seems to me, I don't mean to be offensive, but when DISH comes out with a "new" technology it is applauded here, but if you want the meat and potatoes, regarding a product from DIRECTV, those of us that are bums stuck with DTV, have to shift off to DBSTalk land.
Just wondering about the fairly apparent bias??
Specifically, the "Hopper" from DISH is greeted with great fanfare, compared to DIRECTV's HR34 which is actually technically superior.
It seems to me that "America's Satellite Information Source" might be a bit tilted towards the red end vs the blue end, rather than the purple, where it sets itself to be.
There is a "FIRST LOOK" for the Hopper, where was this for the HR34??
Seems to me, I don't mean to be offensive, but when DISH comes out with a "new" technology it is applauded here, but if you want the meat and potatoes, regarding a product from DIRECTV, those of us that are bums stuck with DTV, have to shift off to DBSTalk land.
Just wondering about the fairly apparent bias??