Scott Greczkowski said:
Well, I guess AMC isn't that difficult to negotiate with. Of course AMC and ATT weren't involved in a separate lawsuit either.
exactly.........just shows that this has nothing to do with increased fees..........just Charlie's ego
We do not know the specific details of the deal.
Don't Uverse subs pay quite a bit? Isn't their Family pack about $54/month?
Also, isn't Hallmark and Hallmark Movie Channel still off Uverse after a 2010 dispute?
And why not? It's an interesting bit of information that can be discussed independently from the "I got a free Roku" thread. It does swing the pendulum back to making the Dish/AMC debacle appear to be more Dish's fault than AMC's....and this is in the DISH forum why? Could have just posted it in the AMC thread?
demsd said:What is your point? They still have a deal, where as we DISH customers are groveling for credits, freebies and giveaways. In the end, many of us still have 3 less channels than we did 24 hours ago, [4 if you count Sundance] and if we are going to watch the shows we are missing, an additional $20 or so a month to pay to do it.
Yet, they were apparently able to come to terms with the evil, money-grubbing AMC Nets.Apparently, Uverse has an unresolved dispute dating back to 2010 involving Hallmark and Hallmark Movie Channel.
Yet, they were apparently able to come to terms with the evil, money-grubbing AMC Nets.
Hmmm. On second thought, maybe they aren't as money-grubbing as some have been claiming.
Moved Thread to UVerse forum where it belongs. Congratulations to AT&T Customers
Moved Thread to UVerse forum where it belongs. Congratulations to AT&T Customers
THAT is what made it pertinent there.If you can explain to me why a thread about AT&T making a deal with AMC is pertinent to Dish other than the fact that AMC and Dish are also having a dispute, then I would agree.
A number of people did. That is why there are posts and replies in it from when it was there.Seriously who cares if they both have the same dispute at the same time?