742 and counting

Peter Parker

Formerly Geronimo
Original poster
Supporting Founder
Lifetime Supporter
Sep 9, 2003
12,308
2,007
At this point it is a foregone conclusion that Bonds will be the all time HR king,. It would seem that only a serious injury can stop him.

Any predictions on when and where?. I am going with Friday July 13 at home against the Dodgers.
 
Hank Aaron is the HR king in my book and Roger M... still holds the 61 record. Do not recognize anyone associated with a cloud of steroid hanging over his head....
 
Can't say I care about this either. Although no proof has been presented (drug test), the cloud of suspicion hangs heavy. Bond's record won't stand too long anyhow, I give A-Rod better than even odds of surpassing Mr Bond's rather dubious achievement.
 
I dislike Barry Bonds but pretty soon he will have the major league home run record. Josh Gibason won't. Hank Aaron won't and neither will Roger Maris though they were all great ballplayers in my opinion.

The fact that we don't like this reality does not stop it from happening. Good luck to A Rod---a few more months like April and he just might do it. But he is at 478 now. Impressive but 264 home runs behind bonds and 277 behind Aaron.


BTW it is a disgrace that men like josh Gibson did not get a chance to play in the major leagues but the claims of 800 to 1000 home runs count a lot of home runs hit in barnstorming games. In actual league games he had far fewer---but they did not play as many games. Given the ratio of HRs to at bats we can safely say he would have hita ton of them but we will never know how many.
 
Last edited:
I dislike Barry Bonds but pretty soon he will have the major league home run record. Josh Gibason won't. Hank Aaron won't and neither will Roger Maris though they were all great ballplayers in my opinion.

The fact that we don't like this reality does not stop it from happening. Good luck to A Rod---a few more months like April and he just might do it. But he is at 478 now. Impressive but 264 home runs behind bonds and 277 behind Aaron.


BTW it is a disgrace that men like josh Gibson did not get a chance to play in the major leagues but the claims of 800 to 1000 home runs count a lot of home runs hit in barnstorming games. In actual league games he had far fewer---but they did not play as many games. Given the ratio of HRs to at bats we can safely say he would have hita ton of them but we will never know how many.
:up :up :up
 
As much as I don't like Bonds, there has never been any proof that he took steroids. Creams don't count.
 
He finally got healthy this year. He's hitting .347, he is leading the league in home runs. On top of that he is 42.

HA HA to all the people who hate him. He is proving he is a great player.
 
He finally got healthy this year. He's hitting .347, he is leading the league in home runs. On top of that he is 42.

HA HA to all the people who hate him. He is proving he is a great player.

I never said he wasn't a good player, hell he might be the best player ever.

I hate him for his time in Pittsburgh being a jerk.

Plus he did great things during the regular season, he just can't play during the post season, three times in Pittsburgh, plus ask SF how well he did in the world series.
 
So am i the only one that is going to guess about when?
 
Barry Bonds is the best player I've ever seen. He will be the HR champ in my book but:

Did he take steroids? Yes
Is he an a$$hole to the media? Yes
Have they proved anything? NO
Does taking steroids make you a better hitter? NO

He's always been a great player but I just want this season to be over so he can retire and the dark cloud that's been around the Giants for all this year goes away.

"plus ask SF how well he did in the world series."

He did his job, it was Baker's fault taking Ortiz out in the 6th or 7th when he was pitching a great game.
 
Barry Bonds is the best player I've ever seen. He will be the HR champ in my book but:

Did he take steroids? Yes
Is he an a$$hole to the media? Yes
Have they proved anything? NO
Does taking steroids make you a better hitter? NO

He's always been a great player but I just want this season to be over so he can retire and the dark cloud that's been around the Giants for all this year goes away.

"plus ask SF how well he did in the world series."

He did his job, it was Baker's fault taking Ortiz out in the 6th or 7th when he was pitching a great game.

His team still lost.
 
It does make fell uneasy but we can't all declare our own statistical champions. it is sad that it has come to this where a cloud hangs over the man who almost certainly will have one of the most coveted records in the sport. then again a different cloud is over the head of the man with the most hits. maybe it is bad karma.
 
So that means he didn't do his job? I don't agree at all.

World Series Hitting Stats: Next Stats >>

SEASON TEAM G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI TB BB SO SB CS OBP SLG AVG
2002 San Francisco Giants 7 17 8 8 2 0 4 6 22 13 3 0 0 .700 1.294 .471

But obviously he didn't do enough, they still lost the world series. He is suppose to be a superstar, rise to occasion, he didn't rise enough.

Look at Dwayne Wade last year in the NBA championship game, they were down 2-0 and because of him, a superstar, came back and won the championship.

If they only played 1 game, I could agree with you, but they lost 4 games during that series, if he was a superstar, he would of won at least 1 of those 4.

He lost 3 straight championship series in Pittsburgh, he can't win the big game, he's great during the regular season, but sucks during post season.
 
The real Homerun King...

I hold the record for most "official" homeruns. From 1972-1981, I belted more than 2000 homeruns during "official" league play. All other records are not recognized by the riffjim4069 sanctioning body and are therefore invalid. :D
 

Who has NHL Finals this year???

IF Barry Bonds were white, would be hated as much??