I just got dish installed last Wednesday and got a 722 (as I requested). I am in the Seattle area and the installer installed two dishes, 1 for 110 and 119 and one for 129 (24").
I have three issues...
1. When mucking around with the DVR timers (I have about 30 now) I occasionally peg it and the receiver becomes non responsive. It takes about a minute to respond to remote commands and in some cases it just reboots. After rebooting it goes about acquiring signal and eventually comes back fully operational.
2. From what I hear 129 is a tough bird to receive. With the dedicated dish, what kind of signal strength range should I expect on a properly peaked dish for this area (Seattle/Pacific NW)? I have the latest FW 442 so I have the "updated" signal strength meter. FYI I get ~50-60 when clear, and I lost signal on 129 over the weekend when it was raining Sunday morning and the signal dove to <10 on some transponders on 129 (110 and 119 appeared fine though slightly lower ss - in the 50-60 range).
3. The installer was very professional and appeared to do a good job (high on roof install). I made the mistake of plugging in the 722 while he was installing peaking the dishes which caused it to install the latest fw before he could peak the dishes. In my defense he didn't say not to plug it in . So when he gets in he says the receiver might be hosed because of the update and that he has a particular set of steps he goes through etc. My question - I thought these receivers were a little better than this now (had dish years ago and had many problems w/the old dishplayer) are they really that flaky? Anyway - I have a feeling if I need him to come back and replace my 722 because of issue #1 he will blame this .
One final thing - the installer wants me to call him directly if I have any problems... seems he gets dinged if I call dish and have to setup a return visit for something. Is this normal?
Thanks!
Mike
I have three issues...
1. When mucking around with the DVR timers (I have about 30 now) I occasionally peg it and the receiver becomes non responsive. It takes about a minute to respond to remote commands and in some cases it just reboots. After rebooting it goes about acquiring signal and eventually comes back fully operational.
2. From what I hear 129 is a tough bird to receive. With the dedicated dish, what kind of signal strength range should I expect on a properly peaked dish for this area (Seattle/Pacific NW)? I have the latest FW 442 so I have the "updated" signal strength meter. FYI I get ~50-60 when clear, and I lost signal on 129 over the weekend when it was raining Sunday morning and the signal dove to <10 on some transponders on 129 (110 and 119 appeared fine though slightly lower ss - in the 50-60 range).
3. The installer was very professional and appeared to do a good job (high on roof install). I made the mistake of plugging in the 722 while he was installing peaking the dishes which caused it to install the latest fw before he could peak the dishes. In my defense he didn't say not to plug it in . So when he gets in he says the receiver might be hosed because of the update and that he has a particular set of steps he goes through etc. My question - I thought these receivers were a little better than this now (had dish years ago and had many problems w/the old dishplayer) are they really that flaky? Anyway - I have a feeling if I need him to come back and replace my 722 because of issue #1 he will blame this .
One final thing - the installer wants me to call him directly if I have any problems... seems he gets dinged if I call dish and have to setup a return visit for something. Is this normal?
Thanks!
Mike