I'll never understand this .... I really wish we could go back 30-40 years where pitchers were allowed to pitch more than 1 stinking inning or 1 batter in some cases.
Case in point, Tigers game last night .... Verlander goes 6 inning, no hitter thru 5, gives up 3 runs in the 6th, but leads when he leaves the game 5-3.
They bring in Wilson I think it was, he pitched a perfect 7th inning .... Bring him out for the 8th Please, unless he's thrown 40 pitches or something odd like that.
But No, that's not allowed in today's game, they have to share .... just like participation games as a kid. Yuck.
Marlins peck away and would have tied it had the Tigers not gotten 2 more after that, when Tigers brought in someone else for the 8th and some else for the 9th.
They bring in Rodriguez for their 9th, he gives up the tying runs, in his behalf, it started with a bloop and a doub l e off home plate, but got hit hard after that, Tigers went on to win in 11....
Verlander went 6 left with the lead and once agian, doesn't get a win ... thank you bull pen.
That rule however it is written should be changed. If the pitcher goes 8 innings and leads the game and the other team ties it in the ninth, anD your team wins it in the bottom of the 9th, guess who gets the Win, yup, the guy that pitched 1 inning AND gave up the tying run, the reliever.
Not the guy that pitched a strong 8.